I also downscale or upscale my input videos to 854x480 for better time management if the quality is not great to begin with. I personally use a CF or 0 or whatever equates to lossless. And the encoding should be done at the highest rate you can do. Anti-aliasing, deblocking, mild noise reduction maybe smoothing.
If your video to be upscaled is of lesser quality then preprocessing is probably going to help. I like to first inspect the video based on input resolution as compared to a know high quality video of the same resolution. That doesn’t mean you can’t take a poor quality video and use VEAI and Proteus but recognize what your working with first. I only use Proteus and have found first the old garbage in garbage out is never more real than when you are trying to upscale even with something like VEAI. If you have made some discoveries and formed your own approach to good results that you share them here, as well. I’m going to submit it separately, in another post to this topic. I am composing an outline of a method I’ve more or less ‘tripped over’ in the last week or two, that is helping me get much better results than I did previously. I’m hoping everyone will contribute their comments here and maybe we can collaborate to find an approach that will get the best enhancement out of Proteus 3. What I am hoping to do is start a discussion of what VEAI user’s methodologies are when it comes to setting Proteus 3 to do its best on your video. Even though it isn’t perfect (yet) you can get a lot more out of it by perfecting your technique. And, I actually hate golf.)Īs I’ve been discovering, Proteus 3 is a tool. It’s not the tool’s fault if the techniques aren’t good… - (That’s a simile I’m using here to illustrate my point. One of the things that struck me was simply having Proteus 3 and some lousy footage to work with wasn’t enough it’s kind of like having a set of expensive “pro” golf clubs and still playing lousy golf. This is with a piece of terrible video I roll out whenever I want to see if VEAI’s enhancement capabilities have evolved enough to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear. I have just finished a session with the VEAI 3.0.0.6 beta where I was taking some really bad, old fil-based source material and converting it to FHD leveraging Proteus 3 to do the heavy lifting. (There is only one thing better than being right that is being absolutely right.) Matrix coefficients : BT.At the popular request, (of one person,) this Topic has been moved from suggested feature discussions to this location.
RTX 3070, Ryzen 5900X, 64GB - played it in MPC, VLC and othersįormat profile : settings : 1 Ref Framesįormat settings, Reference frames : 1 frame DOT nz/file/jwBF1SIa#Snq3AzF5A5EitzW-N8uQyn4_HrwgOl-bvkPSrRsItrY
You can see a sample of what I am talking about here - Raiders of the Lost Ark, few second clip. When I do the same settings for 4K content (2160p), when I play the file the video lags, low FPS. I put it in Medium-Progressive (Artemis) and it outputs a cleaned up, no noise video file, same fps.
#Topaz video enhance ai gaia vs artemis 1080p
When I run Topaz Video Enhance AI on 480p, 720p, 1080p videos, the app works great.
0 kommentar(er)
